User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Vodafone/1.0/LG-GC900/V10b Browser/Obigo-Q7.1 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGC900 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.14801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM LGGC-900mobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LGGC900smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7.1close LGGC900closeclosecloseclose0.026 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.107 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGGC900closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.1 LGGC900mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile LG-GC900closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGGC-900Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:02 | by ThaDafinser