User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS armv7l 3428.149.2) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.87 Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-chromeos.yaml
Chrome 25Chrome OS Webkit 537.22desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.87closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.87closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 25.0WebKit Chrome OS 3428.149desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.87closeChrome OS 25.0.1364.87closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 25.0.1364closeChrome OS 3428.149.2closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.87closeChrome OS 3428.149.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.1 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.87WebKit 537.22ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.87closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:02 | by ThaDafinser