User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; M1003G Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.94 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 41.0Android 4.2unknown iRUPad MasterTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.2iRUPad MasterTabletyesyes0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.94closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.314 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.94closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeAndroid 4.2.2M1003Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.092 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 4.2.2M1003Gtabletyescloseclose0.076 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:02 | by ThaDafinser