User agent detail

Mozilla 5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; zh-cn; vivo E1 Build GRJ90) UC AppleWebKit 534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari 534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
vivoE1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 2.3.5GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.362 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3VivoVivo E1smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.5closeAndroid 2.3.5vivoE1closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.421 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Android 2.3.5VivoE1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:01 | by ThaDafinser