User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:17.0) Gecko/20140621 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.14OS/2 Warp 4.5Gecko 17.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 17.0Gecko 17.0OS/2 Desktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 17.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.14closeOS/2 desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.14Gecko OS/2 desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.14close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.14close closeclosecloseclose0.02 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.14closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.14Gecko 20140621OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.14Gecko 17.0OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 17.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:01 | by ThaDafinser