User agent detail

LG-G4010 AU/4.12 UP.Link/1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGG4010 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
AU 4.12 Brew 2.0LGG4010Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-G4010 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGG4010mobile-browseryescloseclose0.207 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGG4010smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGG4010closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGG4010closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LGG4010mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LG4010Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.07701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:01 | by ThaDafinser