User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; ZP998 Special Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.170 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ZopoZP998 Special Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.170closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.170closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.2ZopoZP998 Specialsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.170closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.2.2ZopoZP998 Specialcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.108 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.170WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.2.2ZP998 Specialmobile:smartyescloseclose0.12 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.170closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.09501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:43:00 | by ThaDafinser