User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; cs-CZ) AppleWebKit/532.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Google Earth/5.2.1.1329 Safari/532.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Google Earth 5.2.1.1329Windows XPWebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 532.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Google Earth 5.2.1.1329closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Google Earth 5.2WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Google Earth 5.2.1closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Google Earth 5.2.1.1329WebKit 532.4Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Google Earth 5.2Webkit 532.4Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:59 | by ThaDafinser