User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/8.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; Microsoft Outlook 15.0.4737; ms-office; MSOffice 15)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-718.php
Outlook 2013Win10 10.08.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Outlook 2013Trident 8.0Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Outlook 2013 closeWindows 10.0email-clientcloseclose0.201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Windows 10desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Outlook 2013closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 8.0Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.369 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Microsoft Office 15Trident 8.0Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:59 | by ThaDafinser