User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0(compatible; U; InfiNet 0.1; Viera) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko)(avdn/Panasonic.tv.2012)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/panasonic.yaml
Webkit 420PanasonicViera 2012television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
PanasonicGALAXY ACE Plussmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0(compatible;close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.117 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 420 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420 PanasonicViera 2012televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:58 | by ThaDafinser