User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini2.4 (SonyEricssonW595a/R3DA026)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonW595a Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser Mini 2.4WebKit JAVA Mobile Phoneyesyes0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser Mini2.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser Mini2.4close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sony EricssonW595afeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 2.4close SonyEricssonW595acloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W595acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser Mini 2.4 Sony EricssonW595amobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:57 | by ThaDafinser