User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (; CUS:; MB70; 1.0; 1.0;) LOH; Opera; CE-HTML/1.0 NetFront/4.1 NETRANGEMMH
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
NetFront 4.1 MB70television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 4.1NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera CEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.1close GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 4.1NetFront SamsungSmart TV 2013tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close MB70closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.1 MB70televisioncloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:56 | by ThaDafinser