User agent detail

Smartsite HTTPClient - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-500.php
yesSmartsite HTTPClientBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSmartsite HTTPClientBot/Crawler0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.11 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 closeclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:56 | by ThaDafinser