User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux; ko-KR) AppleWebKit/534.26+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.26+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/lg.yaml
Webkit 534.26LGNetCast TV 2012television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 534.26closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.26Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.487 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.26 LGNetCast TV 2012televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:54 | by ThaDafinser