User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko Fedora/1.9.0.8-1.fc10 Kazehakase/0.5.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Kazehakase 0.5.6Fedora 1.9.0.8Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Kazehakase 0.5Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.09001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Kazehakase 0.5.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Kazehakase 0.5Gecko Fedora 1.9desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Kazehakase 0.5.6closeFedora 1.9.0closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Kazehakase 0.5.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Kazehakase 0.5.6Gecko Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Kazehakase 0.5.6Gecko 1.9.0Fedora 10desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:54 | by ThaDafinser