User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-US; i-mobile_i-STYLE_7.3A Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/8.7.0.315 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
imobilei-STYLE_7.3A Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.257 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 4.2yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0closeAndroid 4.2.2imobilei-STYLE_7.3Acloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.315WebKit 528.5Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Webkit 528.5Android 4.2.2i-Mobilei-Style 7.3Amobile:smartyescloseclose0.045 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:53 | by ThaDafinser