User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.122 UBrowser/4.1.4627.19 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 4.1Windows 8.1Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.24 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.122WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 4.1Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:52 | by ThaDafinser