User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1; en-us; HTC Bravo_C Build/ERE27) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCBravo C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 530.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.1HTCDesiremobile-browseryescloseclose0.264 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1HTCBravo Csmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.1closeAndroid 2.1.0HTCBravo Ccloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 530.17Android 2.1HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1HTCDesiremobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.1closeAndroid 2.1HTCBravoFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.06501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:51 | by ThaDafinser