User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia501/10.0.16; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/3.7.0.0.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-asha.yaml
Nokia Xpress 3.7.0Nokia Asha Platform 1.0Gecko NokiaAsha 501mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.10201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 3.7Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia501smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 10.0.16;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 3.7.0closeNokia Series 40 Nokia501closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 3.7.0.0.11Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 501closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 3.7.0Gecko Nokia Asha Platform 1.0NokiaAsha 501mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 3.0closeNokia Series 40 Nokia501Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:50 | by ThaDafinser