User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.49 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1196.45 (Edition Next)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Next 16.0OS X Mavericks 10.9Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 16.0Blink MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1196.45closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 16.0.1196.45closeOS X 10.9.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 16.0Blink Mac 10.9desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1196.45closeOS X 10.9.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1196closeMac OS X 10.9.0closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.49closeOS X 10.9.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1196.45WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 16.0Blink OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1196.45closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16.0.1196.45closeMac OS X 10.9.0Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:50 | by ThaDafinser