User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; LOEWE; SL32x; LOH/0.3.5.0;;) CE-HTML/1.0 Config(L:ger,CC:DE) NETRANGEMMH) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4 Presto 2.12.407LoeweConnect SL32 Smart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Smartphone OS Linux DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux LoeweNetTV Seriestv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux LOEWESL32xcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12.407Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.457 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 LoeweConnect SL32 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:49 | by ThaDafinser