User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.1.12 AQUOSBrowser/2.0 (JP12DTV;B;0001;0001) InettvBrowser/2.2 (08001F;DTV12VSFC3;0001;0001)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sharp.yaml
Espial 6.1.12 Webkit 531.2SharpAquos TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Espial 6.1.12close media-playercloseclose0.235 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Espial TV Browser 6.1WebKit SharpAquos Net Plustv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Espial 6.1.12close DTV12VSFC3closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2WebKit 531.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.365 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Espial 6.1.12Webkit 531.2 SharpAquos TVtelevisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:49 | by ThaDafinser