User agent detail

ALCATEL-OT871A/980 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ObigoInternetBrowser/Q05A
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Teleca-Obigo 5.0JAVA unknownunknown AlcatelOne Touch 871AMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 5.0 JAVA AlcatelOne Touch 871AMobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ALCATEL-OT871A 980closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM AlcatelOT-871Amobile-browseryescloseclose0.242 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q05A AlcatelOT871Asmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close AlcatelOT871Acloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A AlcatelOne Touch 871Amobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose AlcatelOT-871AFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:47 | by ThaDafinser