User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Mozilla 1.9Linux unknown1.9 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.9.1.16closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.9.1.16closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.1.16Gecko Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.9.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:47 | by ThaDafinser