User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (QtEmbedded; Linux) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) Kobo eReader Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/ereader/kobo.yaml
Qt Linux Webkit 534.34 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.34closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QT based browser WebKit 534.34Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qt Webkit 534.34Linux closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:47 | by ThaDafinser