User agent detail

MOT-JFJK0/00.62 UP.Browser/6.2.3.4.c.1.123 (GUI) MMP/2.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaJFJK0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-JFJK0 00.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.4.c.1.123close MotorolaW385mobile-browseryescloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 MotorolaJFJK0smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close MotorolaJFJK0closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.4.c.1.123 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 MotorolaJFJK0mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaW385Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:46 | by ThaDafinser