User agent detail

Opera/9.27 (X11; Linux i686; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.27Linux desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.27Presto 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.27closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.27closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.27Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.27closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.27closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.27closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.27 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.27 Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.27closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:45 | by ThaDafinser