User agent detail

Nokia6610FFF/1.0 (4.74) Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 UP.Link/5.1.2.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6610FFF Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia6610FFF 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Nokia6610FFFmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia6610FFFsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia6610FFFcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6610FFFcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia6610FFFmobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:45 | by ThaDafinser