User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0; GomezAgent 3.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
yesGomez Site MonitorBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGomez Site MonitorBot/Crawler0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 13.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 13.0.1closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 13.0.1closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGomezAgentclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 13.0.1closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 13.0.1Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 13.0.1Gecko 13.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 13.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 13.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:43 | by ThaDafinser