User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/7.0; MATM)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Internet Explorer 11.0Windows 7Trident Toshibadesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 11.0Trident 7.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 9.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident Windows 7Toshibadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 9.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 6.1Toshibacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.496 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:43 | by ThaDafinser