User agent detail

HTC-T8697/UCWEB2.0.0.149/47/32079
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCT8697 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC-T8697 UCWEB2.0.0.149closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.209 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.0 HTCT8697smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.0.0close HTCT8697closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0.0.149close closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.0.0.149 HTC T8697closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.432 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.0Gecko HTCT8697mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:43 | by ThaDafinser