User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; QiLive 8 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.94 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 28.0.1500.94Android 4.2.2Blink Qilive8tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.263 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.2Qilive8tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.2.2QiLive 8closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.116 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.94Blink Android 4.2.2QiLive8” Dual core tablettabletyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:42 | by ThaDafinser