User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; CPU iPhone OS 7_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Schoolwires
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Schoolwires App 0.0iOS 7.1unknown AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Schoolwires App WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 536.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 7.1.2AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 7.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 7.1.2closeiOS 7.1.2AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 7.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 536.26iOS 7.1.2AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 536.26iOS 7.1.2AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile on iOS 35closeiOS 7.1.1AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:41 | by ThaDafinser