User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; Motorola M1000;811) Opera 7.50 [ja]./M1000./1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-symbian.yaml
Opera Mobile 7.50UIQ MotorolaM1000mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 7.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 7.50closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 7.50Presto Symbian OS MotorolaM1000smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera M1000.close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 7.50closeSymbian OS closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 7.50closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.042 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 7.50 Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 7.50 UIQ MotorolaM1000mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaA1000Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:41 | by ThaDafinser