User agent detail

ELinks (0.11.3; Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r5 i686; 209x77)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-text.yaml
ELinks 0.11.3Linux desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
ELinks 0.11 Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ELinks closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Elinks 0.11.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Elinks Text-based GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ELinks 0.11closeGentoo 2.6.23closeclosecloseclose0.025 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ELinks 0.11.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
ELinks 0.11.3 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ELinks 0.11.3 Linux desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:41 | by ThaDafinser