User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/6.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-113.php
IE 10.0Win7 6.16.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 10.0Trident 6.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.04601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 9.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 9.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:40 | by ThaDafinser