User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Series60/2.8 NokiaN90-1/2.0521.1.5 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN90-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.08801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.0closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident Symbian OS Series 60 2.8NokiaN90smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 2.8close NokiaN90-1closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MSIE close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident NokiaOS NokiaNokia N90-1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 2.8NokiaN90mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:40 | by ThaDafinser