User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; Win64; x64; rv:16.0) KcB/16.0 Firefox/16.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-811.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknown Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 16.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:16.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 16.0Gecko Windows 8desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 16.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 16.0closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 16.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.18902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 16.0 Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 16.0 Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 16.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 16.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:40 | by ThaDafinser