User agent detail

LGE-VX6000 UP.Browser/4.1.27
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGVX6000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGVX6000Mobile Phoneyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LGE-VX6000 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27close LGVX6000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGVX6000smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.27close LGVX6000closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 LGVX6000mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGVX6000Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:39 | by ThaDafinser