User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (Opera Mini/5.0 U;compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.6) ASUS-P527/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Confi
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AsusP527 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 7.6Trident 3.1WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.6closeWindows OperaMini 5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.0Presto Windows CE AsusP527smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.0closeWindows CEclosecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.0closeWindows CE AsusP527closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.0 UcloseWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.08901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.0 Windows Mobile 6.1AsusP527mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close OperaMini 5Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:39 | by ThaDafinser