User agent detail

MOT-W408g/[TFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX]UP.Browser/ (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaW408g Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.07401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-W408g closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave close MotorolaW408gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser MotorolaW408gsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaW408gcloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave MotorolaW408gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaW408gFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:39 | by ThaDafinser