User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Firefox/3.6.28
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-318.php
Firefox 3.6MacOSX 10.41.9.2 AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2MacOSX 10.4AppleMacintoshDesktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.28closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.28closeOS X 10.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Mac 10.4desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.28closeOS X 10.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.28closeMac OS X 10.4closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.28closeOS X 10.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.28Gecko 20120306Mac OS X 10.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.28Gecko 1.9.2Mac OS X 10.4desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.28closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:38 | by ThaDafinser