User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0(Java; U; MIDP-2.0; es-la; samsung m3510l) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.7.0.218 U2/1.0.0 Mobile,SAMSUNG-M3510L/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.102 (GUI) MMP/2.0 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungm3510l Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.102close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7 Samsungm3510lsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0close Samsungm3510lcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.218 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2Gecko Samsungm3510lmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:38 | by ThaDafinser