User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (AmigaOS; AmigaOS 53.26 PowerPC; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20120327 Firefox/4.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
Firefox 4.0.1AmigaOS 53.26Gecko 2.0.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 2.0Gecko 2.0 Desktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 4.0.1closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 4.0Gecko AmigaOS 53.26desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 4.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 4.0.1close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 4.0.1closeAmigaOS 53.26closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 4.0.1Gecko 20120327 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 4.0.1Gecko 2.0.1AmigaOS 53.26desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0.1closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 4.0.1closeMac OS X 10.6Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:38 | by ThaDafinser