User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; MSOffice 12)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Outlook 2007 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Outlook 2007Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Outlook 2007 closeWindows 5.1email-clientcloseclose0.32103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Outlook 2007closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.09601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Microsoft Office 12 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.10501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:38 | by ThaDafinser