User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010031705 Red Hat/3.0.19-1.el4 Firefox/3.0.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.0.19Red Hat 4Gecko 1.9.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.0Gecko 1.9.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.08801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.19closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.0.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.0Gecko Red Hat 3.0desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0.19closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.0.19closeRed Hat 3.0.19closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.0.19closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.0.19Gecko 2010031705Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.0.19Gecko 1.9.0Red Hat 4desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.0.19closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:37 | by ThaDafinser