User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/534.57.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) WebClip/7537.76.1 Safari/7537.76.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-323.php
WebClip 0.0MacOSX 10.7unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
WebClip WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7537.76.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 7537.76.4closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac 10.7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 534.57.7Mac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 534.57.7OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:37 | by ThaDafinser