User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.2) Gecko/20090729 Slackware/13.0 Firefox/3.5.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 3.5.2Slackware 13.0Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.5Gecko Slackware 13.0desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.5.2closeSlackware 13.0closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.5.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5.2Gecko 20090729Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.5.2Gecko 1.9.1Slackware 13.0desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5.6closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:36 | by ThaDafinser