User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 4.0.1; zh-cn; HTC_HD7_4G_T9399+_For_AT&T; 480*800) UCWEB7.9.4.145/139/800
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCHD7 4G T9399+ For_AT&T Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux HTCA810emobile-browseryescloseclose0.24802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 GNU/Linux HTCHD7 4G T9399+ For ATsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.4closeAndroid 4.0.1HTCHD7 4G T9399+ For_AT&Tcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.4.145closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.4.145 Linux HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9 Android 4.0.1HTCHD7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.026 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:36 | by ThaDafinser