User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.0.4; zh-CN; Lenovo A530) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.360 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
UC Browser 9.5.0.360Android 4.0.4 LenovoA530smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux LenovoS720mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 Android 4.0LenovoA530smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0closeAndroid 4.0.4LenovoA530closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.0.360 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko Android 4.0.4LenovoA530mobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:35 | by ThaDafinser